Go to Teamsters Local Union 174's Home Page
News Archives for March & April 2009
Stories on this page:

Divider

IBT News Release:
THE U.S. NEEDS TRADE OVERHAUL

TWO DECADES OF TERRIBLE TRADE POLICIES INDICATE IT IS TIME FOR A CHANGE

(April 30, 2009) WASHINGTON, D.C. – The following commentary by IBT General President Jim Hoffa was released by the IBT this week, and has appeared in many leading newspapers and on the Internet.

 

WE NEED A NEW TRADE FRAMEWORK

Kathleen Sebelius
IBT General President Jim Hoffa recently commented on the bad condition U.S. Trade Policy is in.

You don’t have to have a Ph.D. to understand that our trade policies of the past 20 years have failed. In fact, if you were a high school graduate and had a manufacturing job that was sent to Mexico, you would get it better than any college professor or trade guru.

So-called free-trade agreements from the North American Free Trade Agreement to the Central America Free Trade Agreement to the World Trade Organization were sold as a way of boosting countries’ economies. We now know how NAFTA and subsequent trade deals have hurt U.S. workers.

Our overall trade framework is broken. President Barack Obama, recognizing this, campaigned on a pledge to reform our existing trade agreements. During the Summit of the Americas recently, little mention was made of the Free Trade Area of the Americas treaty, proposed 15 years ago at the first such summit.

Our members are tremendously angered by NAFTA and the trade deals modeled on it. What was billed as free trade has robbed them of their jobs and their wages. In the 15 years of NAFTA and the WTO, 4.3 million manufacturing jobs left the United States, and household incomes stagnated.

In Mexico, the result wasn’t any better. NAFTA displaced farmers from subsistence agriculture and enterprises that couldn’t compete in the global market. Wages have actually gone down in Mexico.

It is time for a new trade policy that promotes the interests of workers and their communities, not just the interests of wealthy corporations. And it is crucial that our trade policies promote the protection and creation of U.S. jobs and opportunities.

That is exactly why the U.S. trade representative should not try to advance the treaties with Panama or Colombia that were negotiated by former President George W. Bush.

The American people don’t need or want a leftover trade deal negotiated with Panama under the Bush administration. That deal won’t create jobs, but it will continue to encourage tax evasion by U.S. companies. Panama is a country notorious for helping 350,000 corporations, including American International Group, evade taxes.
Panama ought to provide its own citizens with the protections it provides tax-evading corporations. Too many Panamanian children work as servants, and forced labor is a growing problem.

Discrimination against women is widespread, and the government has done little to tackle the problem of discrimination against ethnic minorities.

Colombia’s labor and human rights conditions are still horrific, and a trade deal with that country is insupportable. Last year, 42 trade union members were assassinated, more than in 2007. There are also growing revelations about the Uribe administration’s links to right-wing paramilitaries responsible for the assassinations of union, Afro-Colombian and indigenous community leaders.

The killings of union members seeking to exercise their basic rights must end before it would be appropriate to consider any trade agreement with Colombia.

American workers are relying on the Obama administration to make sure our country doesn’t enter into another NAFTA-style trade deal. That includes the Bush administration’s leftover Panama and Colombia pacts, which are now being pushed by the same special interests that promoted NAFTA, CAFTA and the WTO.

Let’s put a stop to these ill-conceived trade agreements and focus on rebuilding the U.S. economy.


Teamsters News Link:

SEBELIUS SWORN IN
NEW SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES “APPROVED” AFTER SENATE CONFIRMATION THANKS TO SWINE FLU OUTBREAK

Associated Press

Kathleen Sebelius
New U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius.

(April 28, 2009) WASHINGTON, D.C. – Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius won Senate confirmation Tuesday, April 28, as the nation's Health and Human Services Secretary, thrusting her into the middle of a public health emergency with the swine flu sickening dozens of Americans. The 65-31 confirmation vote came after Democrats urged quick action so that Sebelius could get to work leading the federal response to the flu outbreak.

"We find ourselves in the midst of a global crisis," said Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn. "What we've been missing in all of this is the head of the Health and Human Services Department."

Sixty votes in the 100-seat Senate were necessary for approval. Immediately after the vote Sebelius resigned as governor in Kansas and headed to Washington to be sworn in. She drove directly from Andrews Air Force Base in Maryland to the White House, where she took her oath in the Oval Office.

"We wanted to swear her in right away because we've got a significant public health challenge that requires her immediate attention," President Obama said, standing beside the last Cabinet official to win Senate approval. "We needs all hands on deck," he said. "I expect her to hit the ground running." Sebelius immediately went to the White House's Situation Room for a briefing with Obama's homeland security adviser, John Brennan, and other officials dealing with the first domestic test of the administration, which turns 100 days old on Wednesday.

Replacing Sebelius as the state's chief executive was the lieutenant governor, Mark Parkinson, 51, a former Republican lawmaker and state party chairman Sebelius had persuaded to be her running mate in 2006. Parkinson has said he plans no major policy or staff changes and wouldn't run for a full term next year.

Republican opponents cited Sebelius' pro-abortion stances and her initial underreporting of campaign contributions from a late-term abortion doctor. They raised concerns about whether Obama administration plans to overhaul the nation's health system would cut out Republicans and lead to rationing of care.

"She is the wrong appointee for this particular assignment," said Sen. Robert Bennett, R-Utah. "She has backed a partisan process for health care reform. She has refused to support patient safeguards."

With no HHS secretary in place, the White House had turned to Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano to help lead its response to the swine flu, even while insisting that vacancies at the top of HHS were not a problem.

Sebelius, 60, a two-term Democrat, was the first of 20 HHS officials requiring Senate approval to win it, and she heads to work with many team members missing. The Senate hasn't acted on Obama's nominees for deputy HHS secretary or commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, and Obama hasn't even nominated people for other key jobs, including surgeon general and assistant secretary for preparedness and response.

There's also not been an appointment for head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, another component of the sprawling HHS, which has 65,000 employees and a $750 billion budget.
The whole process suffered a setback when Obama's first pick for HHS secretary, former Sen. Tom Daschle of South Dakota, withdrew in February over unpaid taxes.

Though the swine flu will be an immediate focus, Sebelius will also be charged with shepherding Obama's overhaul of the nation's $2.5 trillion health care system to reduce costs and cover some 50 million uninsured Americans.

 

IBT News Release:
FEDEX DECISION A BAD ONE

IBT PACKAGE DIVISION DIRECTOR KEN HALL BLASTS U.S. APPEALS COURT FEDEX RULING

(April 27, 2009) Washington, D.C. – The following is an official statement by Ken Hall, Teamsters International Vice President and Director of the Teamsters Package Division, regarding the recent decision on FedEx Home by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia:

Ken Hall

 

IBT Package Division Director and International Vice President Ken Hall has on behalf of the Teamsters Union decried the recent decision on FedEx Home by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

“We are disappointed in the court’s decision to deprive FedEx drivers of the right to form unions and bargain for better working conditions and wages, leaving them at the mercy of this notoriously anti-worker company run by a member of the Forbes 2008 Billionaires Club. We are confident that the decision will not survive review by the full court or by the U.S. Supreme Court. 
 
“The Teamsters’ fight on behalf of these workers will not stop. We remain committed to those FedEx drivers who have sought the protection of a legitimate collective bargaining agreement to improve their lives.
 
“The facts remain: More than 30 states continue administrative and tax reviews of the employee status of FedEx Home drivers. The IRS is examining the company’s tax classification for 2002, 2004, 2005 and 2006, and the federal courts are still hearing the national and state claim lawsuits. 
 
“The National Labor Relations Board has primary authority to determine whether workers are properly classified as employees or independent contractors, and reviewing courts are required to defer to the board’s justifiable findings. In yesterday’s decision, the majority of the court chose to ignore its legal obligation to defer judgment to the NLRB, disregarding detailed findings. 
 
“Since 1968, the Supreme Court has consistently instructed the NLRB to use a common-law test to determine employee status, which led to the finding that the drivers are employees. The court majority disregarded virtually all of these factors required by the Supreme Court in favor of an evaluation on whether the drivers had ‘potential entrepreneurial opportunities.’ As noted by the dissenting judge, the majority failed to apply the proper standard for determining employment status.
 
“The reality of the workplace, as found by the NLRB’s reasoned decision, is that FedEx clearly controls the daily existence of the driver. Yet they are without the legal protections and benefits of employees.”

[Following is a Teamsters News Link entry on the FedEx situation.]


Teamsters News Link:
DRIVERS MAY NOT JOIN UNION AT FEDEX HOME, COURT RULES


New York Times

(April 23, 2009) Thousands of drivers for the home-delivery subsidiary of the FedEx Corporation do not have the right to join a union because they are independent contractors and not employees, a divided federal appeals court in Washington ruled on Tuesday.

The ruling was FedEx Home's biggest victory in a series of disputes with the Teamsters union, class-action lawyers and state officials over whether it had misclassified its drivers as contractors rather than employees to deny them various benefits and the right to unionize.

The ruling overturned a decision by the National Labor Relations Board, which had held that these drivers were employees because they were an essential part of FedEx Home's business. The labor board also said that the company “exercised substantial control” over the performance of the drivers' functions, noting that they must dress the way the company wants, operate vehicles that meet the company's specifications and must display the FedEx logo and colors.

In the 2-to-1 ruling, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit concluded that FedEx Home did not have to bargain with the Teamsters even though a majority of drivers at two terminals in Massachusetts had voted overwhelmingly to join that union. FedEx Home, with 4,000 drivers, is a division of FedEx Ground Packaging Systems and delivers packages up to 75 pounds, mainly to residential customers.

The court found that FedEx Home's drivers have “entrepreneurial potential” and can operate multiple routes and sell routes as well as hire helpers and additional drivers, and therefore should be considered independent contractors.

FedEx Home applauded the ruling. Maury Lane, a company spokesman, said the decision and a recent ruling in Washington State “confirm that FedEx Ground contractors are independent business owners who choose to own and operate their own enterprises as they like.”

Ken Hall, the director of the Teamsters' package division, criticized the ruling. “We are confident that the decision will not survive review by the full court or by the U.S. Supreme Court,” he said. “We remain committed to those FedEx drivers who have sought the protection of a legitimate collective bargaining agreement to improve their lives.”

In the ruling, Judge Janice Rogers Brown, an appointee of George W. Bush, and Judge Stephen F. Williams, a senior judge appointed by Ronald Reagan, signed the majority opinion. Judge Merrick B. Garland, who was appointed by Bill Clinton, dissented, writing that the drivers should be considered employees.

In his dissent, Judge Garland wrote that the drivers had little “entrepreneurial opportunity,” rarely take advantage of it and stand to make little money from selling their trucks or routes. He also argued that for drivers to hire helpers is hardly entrepreneurial and noted that FedEx Home puts limits on drivers' ability to sell routes and can freely change their routes.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs voiced concern that the ruling could affect a nationwide class-action suit involving 27,000 FedEx Ground drivers, who accuse the company of misclassifying them as contractors to deny them overtime and health, retirement and other benefits.

Last December, the company agreed to pay $27 million to settle a misclassification lawsuit brought on behalf of 203 drivers in California.

In that suit, a state judge wrote that FedEx Ground had “close to absolute control” over the drivers, adding that the operating agreement they signed was “a brilliantly drafted contract creating the constraints of an employment relationship” disguised in the independent contractor model.

 

Washington State Labor Council Commentary:
DO WE SUCK? SNOHOMISH, SPOKANE EDC’S DISAGREE

BUSINESS-CLIMATE ASSESSMENTS DEPEND ON GOAL:
ATTRACTING JOBS … OR TAX CUTS


Rick Bender

Rick Bender, President of the Washington State Labor Council, and his organization do not agree that Washington State is not a good source of jobs. Neither does the Teamsters Union.

(April 24, 2009) This is an ad that appeared in the February 2009 edition of Alaska Airlines Magazines, paid for by Greater Spokane Inc., which says it's "the Region’s only Regional Chamber of Commerce and Economic Development Council."  In touting Washington as "The #1 State to Start a Business," they have a very different take on this state's "competitiveness" than do their compatriots at in Snohomish County. The Snohomish EDC is one of the groups championing the cause of cutting benefits for laid-off and injured workers in order to keep Boeing from leaving Washington state.

The "We Suck" crowd, a bandwagon built by former Boeing boss Alan Mulally back in 2003 and now populated by business lobbying groups and politicians in both parties, continues to bash our "business friendliness" in the context of seeking tax breaks and other legislative goodies in Olympia. And their Washington-hatin' rhetoric is swallowed whole by just about every newspaper editorial board in the state. 

But their message is in direct conflict with what objective out-of-state assessments of our state's business climate have found. As quoted in the Greater Spokane Inc. ad above, a January 2009 report in the U.S. News and World Report said, "Washington ranks first in the U.S. in pursuing alternative-energy sources. It also has a highly productive manufacturing sector, signaling high wages and a tech-intensive economy. Washington has very low taxes, reducing your costs of growing a business. It does not have personal income or capital-gains taxes."

Here's some other news from outside our state's "We Suck" echo chamber: (For more information, see the WSLC's Legislative Position Paper on our state's business climate.)

Washington state is ranked the 3rd best place in Forbes magazine's "best states to do business" ranking for 2008, and was the only state in the top five in the labor, regulatory environment and growth categories. (www.forbes.com

Washington is ranked 12th best in the nation for 2009 in terms of "business  friendliness" by the Tax Foundation, a conservative Washington D.C.-based think tank. Its annual report compares the states’ tax environments by measuring their sales and gross receipts taxes, unemployment insurance taxes, corporate and individual income taxes, and something called the "Fiscal Balance Index." (www.taxfoundation.org/sbtci.html)

Washington ranks 5th best in the nation in the 2008 Small Business Survival Index of the Small Business & Entrepreneur Council, a business lobbying group that advocates for tax relief and regulatory reform that benefits small businesses. Washington’s West Coast competitors, Oregon ranked 32nd and California ranked 49th. (www.sbecouncil.org)

So why do people still insist "we suck" and prescribe slashing the safety nets for workers who have the misfortune of getting laid off or injured on the job?  The explanation hasn't changed since the staff of WSLC Reports Today wrote the following back in October 2004:

Here's a newsflash: This state will NEVER be "business friendly" enough for Corporate Washington and the lawmakers they sponsor.  There will always be another business tax to exempt, a work safety regulation that needs repealing, an expensive environmental permit that should be junked.  Always.  Forever and ever.  And this is true for corporate lobbyists throughout the land -- in every state.

Take Kansas, for example (please). It is a so-called Right-to-Work (anti-union) state with unemployment insurance taxes about one-third of what employers pay here and a state minimum wage of $2.65 an hour. And yet, amidst Boeing's acceptance of government incentive "bids" for its 7E7 work, Boeing's Mulally was there reciting an all-too familiar refrain: "We want to (keep jobs) in Wichita -- as long as we can be competitive."  Meanwhile, the hand-wringing commercial press lamented, "How can Wichita compete?" 

(Update: Boeing is now selling its Wichita factory, despite Kansas putting up $500 million in state-backed bonds as part of its bid for 7E7 nose and cockpit work. So look for panicked Kansas legislators to approve The Job-Creating Indentured Servitude Act of 2005.) 
And speaking of our aerospace competitors in Kansas, that state just approved legislation to nearly TRIPLE its minimum wage! 

"Job killers! JOB KILLERS!"

 

2009 Ann Gallagher Memorial Scholarship

(April 22, 2009) Applications for the 2009 Ann Gallagher Memorial Scholarship are now available. You can download a copy here. This scholarship is available to graduating high school seniors whose parent is a member of an affiliated union. Applications must be submitted by July 10, 2009 to be considered.


IBT News Release:

CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER

IBT PRESIDENT HOFFA COMMENTARY ON UNSAFE MEXICAN TRUCKS ON AMERICAN HIGHWAYS

Hoffa
IBT General President Jim Hoffa speaks up again about the dangers of unsafe Mexican trucks on U.S. Highways.

(April 20, 2009) The following editorial by IBT President James P. Hoffa has been appearing all over the country on the Internet and in newspapers for the past week.

KEEP OUT UNSAFE MEXICAN TRUCKS

There is no question that Mexico is a much more dangerous place than the United States. So the idea of allowing unsafe trucks from Mexico unfettered access to our highways, risking the lives of U.S. drivers and endangering our national security, is outrageous.

Congress recently shut the border to these dangerous trucks, and Mexico has retaliated by raising some tariffs. Supporters cry protectionism. But the United States shouldn't be bullied by Mexico.

When the North American Free Trade Agreement was passed in 1994, the United States had a $1 billion trade surplus with Mexico. Last year, the trade deficit had ballooned to $64 billion. That's hardly protectionism.

What this debate is really about is safety and security. Mexico hasn't met our safety standards.

In fact, a Feb. 20 State Department alert warns U.S. citizens about driving in Mexico, urging travel during daylight hours on main roads if driving can't be avoided.

An escalating drug war there also puts our national security at risk by destabilizing Mexico along the U.S. border. More than 7,000 people in the past year have been killed.

Recent media reports document that Hezbollah uses the same southern narcotics routes as Mexican drug lords to smuggle drugs and people into the United States.

"They work together," Michael Braun, retired assistant administrator and chief of operations at the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency, told The Washington Times. "They rely on the same shadow facilitators. One way or another, they are all connected."

The U.S. Justice Department recently filed lawsuits against Union Pacific Railroad Co., seeking $37 million in damages for allegedly failing to prevent its rail cars from being used to smuggle drugs into the country.

Do we really want to open our border to trucks from Mexico, letting them travel freely throughout the United States without the ability to track them? I don't think so. Most Americans agree, which is why Congress shut down the program.

Mexican trucks and drivers aren't required to meet the same safety standards as U.S. trucks and drivers. Mexican trucks are older, dirtier and more dangerous.

Limits on the hours a driver can spend behind the wheel are ignored in Mexico. U.S. truck drivers are taken off the road if they commit a serious traffic violation in their personal vehicle. Not so in Mexico.

The Bush administration opened the border to dangerous trucks from Mexico in 2007, with a few of the safest trucks handpicked to participate in a pilot program. But alarmingly, U.S. officials were unable to determine when a participating Mexican truck entered the country or where it went. The Department of Transportation's inspector general reported that no conclusions could be made about the trucks' safety record.

A NAFTA tribunal ruled in 2001 that the United States has the right to enforce safety standards. So when Mexico keeps its end of the bargain, we can keep ours.

Local 174 Announcement:
GENERAL TEAMSTERS RETIREES CLUB GOLF TOURNEY COMING UP AUGUST 13

Hank Thompson
General Teamsters Retirees Club President Hank Thompson, a golf legend in his own mind, invites you to join him on August 13 at the Annual GTRC Golf Tournament.

(April 20, 2009) For all of you Teamsters who like golf and care about the education of our young, mark Thursday, August 13 on your calendar. That is the date of the annual General Teamsters Retirees Club’s Golf Tournament — which was started by the retirees of Local 174.

For only $85 dollars the day features a “shotgun” start, a cart, lunch, prizes, a trophy, and lots of laughs. Foster Golf Links is located in Tukwila only a short distance north of the Teamster Building, and is a “Union” course, represented by Local 763.

ALL THE PROCEEDS from the tournament go to the scholarship applicants who are the children and grandchildren of active and retired members in locals 174, 117, 763, and 38. With tuitions soaring in our wounded economy, these kids need financial help more than ever. So dust off those old sticks, call some friends, and come on down in August and we can all make that old 174 bromide “people helping people” really mean something.

You do not have to be good at golf — those balls you hit into the woods will amuse your golfing partners, and give the squirrels something to bury next fall.

Entry forms will be appearing on your Local Union shelves in the near future.

 

IBT News Release:
WORKERS’ MEMORIAL DAY

APRIL 28 OBSERVANCE GIVES UNIONS A CHANCE TO MOURN FOR THE DEAD WHILE AT THE SAME TIME FIGHTING FOR BETTER TIMES FOR THE LIVING

Memorial Photo

(April 16, 2009) Workers' Memorial Day is coming up on April 28. The Teamsters and other Unions recognize this important yearly Day as a chance to “Mourn for the Dead, and Fight for the Living.” That thought was originally expressed by the famous Labor Activist Mother Jones a Century ago.

Since 1989, the Labor Movement has observed Workers’ Memorial Day to remember those who have suffered and died on the job. As we remember those who died in workplace catastrophes, suffered diseases due to exposure to toxic substances or injured in dangerous working conditions, we rededicate ourselves to the fight for safe workplaces.

Decades of struggle by workers and their unions have resulted in significant improvements in working conditions. But the toll of workplace injuries, illnesses and deaths remains enormous. More than 56,000 workers die annually from workplace injuries and illnesses; another 6 million are seriously hurt.

WHY COMMEMORATE ON APRIL 28?
April 28 was chosen because it is the anniversary of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and has been recognized as an international day remembrance for dead and injured workers since 1996, when a Global Union delegation lit a commemoration candle to highlight the plight of workers at the United Nations.

It has been officially endorsed by the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU) and the International Labor Organization (ILO). Eleven countries or territories formally recognize April 28 as a national observance day: Argentina, Belgium, Bermuda, Brazil, Canada, Dominican Republic, Panama, Peru, Portugal, Spain and Taiwan. A Workers' Memorial Day is observed in nearly 100 countries.

The toll of workplace injuries, illnesses and deaths remains enormous. Hundreds of thousands of workers are injured or killed every year.  Highway incidents continue to be the leading cause of on-the-job fatalities, and truck drivers suffer more on-the-job fatalities than any other individual occupation. Ergonomic hazards cripple and injure hundreds of thousands of workers every year and remain the nation’s biggest workplace safety and health problem.  
 
Some groups of workers are particularly at risk, suffering very high rates of job injuries and fatalities.  Hispanic and immigrant workers, who often work in the most dangerous jobs and are exploited by employers, have no union protections and are afraid to speak out.  Many public sector workers also have no OSHA protection.  Hundreds of workers are fired or harassed by their employers each year simply for voicing job-safety concerns or reporting injuries.  OSHA, Department of Transportation (DOT), and Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) whistle-blower and anti-retaliation provisions
are too weak to provide any real protection to workers who try to exercise their legal rights.


LAMONT BYRD: REASONS FOR REMEMBERING AND IDEAS FOR OBSERVANCES

Speaking for the IBT, Teamsters Union Safety and Health Department Director LaMont Byrd wrote the following:

LaMont Byrd
Teamsters Safety and Health Department Director LaMont Byrd has suggestions for IBT Local Unions and their members for Workers’ Memorial Day, April 28.

“Dear Brothers and Sisters: On April 28, 2009, the labor movement will observe Workers’ Memorial Day to remember workers who have been killed or injured on the job and to energize the fight for strong safety and health protections. 
 
For decades, Unions have led the struggle for improved working conditions and dignity and respect on the job. Unions have won legislation and protections that have made the workplace safer for all workers.  Still, each year millions of workers are injured, diseased, or killed by job hazards. 
 
This Workers’ Memorial Day, I urge you to get involved and organize actions, activities, or observances in your workplace and community to highlight the toll of job injuries and deaths. Make it clear that the labor movement will continue to fight for safety and defend the protections we have already won. Reach out to labor activists and others in your community to join planned activities.

IBT OFFERS IDEAS AND HELP
The IBT Safety and Health Department has developed a webpage, available on the IBT website (“www.teamster.org”), with ideas and information to assist you in your Workers’ Memorial Day activities. You can also let the Department know about your events by completing the form on the website, e-mailing at “ibtsafety@teamster.org”, or calling 202-624-6960.

Please join us on Workers’ Memorial Day, April 28, 2009, to honor our fallen Brothers and Sisters and to keep on fighting for the promise of safe jobs for all workers.”

 

IBT News Release:
EFCA BATTLE INTENSIFYING

efca logo(April 13, 2009) The battle in the media between the proponents and the opponents of the Employee Free Choice Act is becoming fierce. The Teamsters Union is among the leaders fighting for passage of the EFCA. On April 9, the IBT released the following article about the EFCA situation.

WALL STREET CHOOSES GREED OVER WORKERS, EMPLOYEE FREE CHOICE ACT

Second Ad in A Week Builds on Hundreds of Grassroots Events and Momentum For Legislation During Congressional Recess

Greeted with a new massive nationwide ad campaign along with over 350 grassroots actions, members of Congress returned to their home states and districts this week to be reminded that a majority of the public demands passage of the Employee Free Choice Act. A new, hard-hitting television ad hit national airwaves exposing the real motives of those who oppose the Employee Free Choice Act. It joins another ad already on the air and grassroots events across the country highlighting the broad support for the bill.

The ad calls out corporations, many of whom have received billions of dollars in taxpayer-funded bailouts, as opposing workers’ freedom to bargain with their employers for better wages and benefits at a time when the imbalance of power is the reason for our economic crisis.

Instead of focusing on rebuilding our economy and getting us out of the mess they helped to create, the ad points out that companies like Bank of America took $45 billion in taxpayer money and have been working against the Employee Free Choice Act, exploiting their low wage workers, and rewarding its leaders, like CEO Ken Lewis, with million dollar payouts.

“The public and lawmakers alike need to know that the special interests opposing the Employee Free Choice Act are the same ones who caused this economic meltdown,” said American Rights at Work Executive Director Mary Beth Maxwell. “This new ad sends a resolute message that now is the time to help workers to bargain for a better life. The Employee Free Choice Act is urgently needed to create fairness in this economy.”

The momentum for the Employee Free Choice Act is growing, with ramped up grassroots events underway during the recess including rallies, anti-corporate actions, leafleting, lobbying, town hall meetings, moving billboards, community forums, vigils, call-in days, and more. Workers, elected officials, small business owners, students, faith leaders, civil rights activists, and other advocates, are participating in an array of actions underscoring the broad and diverse support for the measure.

The new ad campaign and recess activities continue to build on the broad support for the Employee Free Choice Act: independent polling confirmed a majority of the public supports its passage; over 40 leading economists — including Nobel laureates — released a joint statement endorsing the legislation as a critical part of our economic recovery; and just last week the “Faces of the Employee Free Choice Act” campaign was unveiled by award-winning cast members of The West Wing standing alongside workers to promote the freedom to form unions on Capitol Hill.

“Greed” launches nationwide today, following the Sunday launch of “Fabric of America.” To view the new ad and for more information, visit www.FreeChoiceAct.org or www.americanrightsatwork.org.

 

Washington State Labor Council Women's Committee Scholarship Nominations

The Washington State Labor Council Women's Committee is offering six (6) scholarships to rank-and-file union women. The Scholarships being offered are for the following summer schools for union women.

• Summer Institute for Union Women, August 11-15, 2009, at the University of California at Los Angeles. Two (2) scholarships are available.
• 2009 Summer School for Union Women, July 22-26, 2009, at the Evergreen State College in Olympia. Four (4) scholarships are available.

Both summer schools offer a series of in-depth courses, workshops, solidarity and fun! While agendas have not yet been finalized, prior summer school classes have included leadership development, organizing our unions and community for action and communication strategies.

Scholarships include tuition, room and board provided at the facility and reasonable travel expenses. No loss time will be paid. Participants must be able to take vacation or union leave.

The deadline for applying for these scholarships is May 30th. Application forms (along with a 100-word or less letter from the applicant) must be received by the deadline in order to be considered. Individuals may apply for one or both of these scholarships.

If you have questions regarding the scholarships or would like an Application Form, please contact Women's Committee staff, Bernice Vance, at 206-281-8901 or 1-800-542-0904.

 

Lamont Byrd
The IBT strongly disagrees with the politically-motivated financial scheming of South Carolina’s Republican Governor Mark Sanford.

IBT News Release:

SANFORD PLAYING POLITICS
TEAMSTERS LAW ENFORCEMENT LEAGUE CALLS ON SOUTH CAROLINA’S GOVERNOR TO PROTECT AND SERVE HIS CONSTITUENTS

(April 7, 2009) IBT, Washington, D.C. — The Teamsters Law Enforcement League has denounced a selfish political ploy by South Carolina Republican Governor Mark Sanford, who has refused more than $700 million in federal aid for education and law enforcement unless the Federal Government pays down the debt by an equal amount.

Sanford has decided that earning media attention to help his future political ambitions is more important than protecting the hardworking men and women that patrol our streets and educate our children.

“In a State that has the second-highest unemployment in the Nation, it is outrageous that Gov. Sanford is refusing federal aid that will help workers in some of our most critical public services — law enforcement and education,” said Jim Hoffa, General President of the Teamsters Union, which represents more than 1.4 million workers in North America.

“In this economic climate. the Governor should not be playing political games with people’s livelihoods.”

As a result of Sanford’s political stunt, thousands of law enforcement officers and teachers could lose their jobs, and thousands of inmates could be released early from prisons. Sanford has been harshly criticized by both political parties in South Carolina.

On behalf of the members in law enforcement that the Teamsters Union represents, the Teamsters Law Enforcement League denounces Sanford’s actions and requests he immediately accept the funds so the residents of South Carolina do not suffer due to his arrogance.

 

IBT News Release:
‘FABRIC OF AMERICA’

NATIONAL TV AD FOR EMPLOYEE FREE CHOICE ACT

Mary Beth Maxwell American Rights at Work Executive Director Mary Beth Maxwell

American Rights at Work is a national advocacy organization launched in 2003 whose mission is “to modernize and reform our nation’s labor laws to better meet the needs of 21st century employers and workers,” according to its website.

Maxwell’s work has garnered national news coverage in the pages of The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal, among many other news outlets, dramatically altering the public debate about the need for employers and workers to have access to a fair collective bargaining process. She is widely acknowledged as a leading voice for improving the effectiveness of the National Labor Relations Board and in finding common ground among diverse groups to solve problems in our nation’s antiquated labor-management public policies.

Maxwell brought more than 15 years of management experience, staff development, policy reform, and grassroots organizing skills to her current ARW position. She previously served as National Field Director for Jobs with Justice. During her tenure, the JwJ organization quadrupled the number of local affiliates, with similar growth in its national staff. As a result, the organization engaged new allies, mobilized support, and built relationships with stakeholders to broaden and strengthen the causes of worker and economic justice.

(April 3, 2009) As Members of Congress depart Washington, DC this week to return to their home states and districts for the April recess, a new massive ad campaign, along with hundreds of grassroots actions await their arrival. A new television ad will run nationwide and over 300 events will be held across the country to remind elected officials that a majority of the public demands passage of the Employee Free Choice Act.

The grassroots activity planned for the recess includes rallies, leafleting, lobbying, town hall meetings, moving billboards, community forums, vigils, call-in days, and more. Workers, elected officials, students, civil rights leaders, and other advocates, will participate in an array of actions underscoring the broad and diverse support for the measure.

“This recess, we will not allow our leaders to forget that workers across the country are counting on them to make the economy work for everyone again,” said American Rights at Work Executive Director Mary Beth Maxwell. “There is an unwavering commitment by a majority of lawmakers to restore our middle class and give workers back the freedom to bargain for a better life. Our ramped up efforts send a strong message to the rest of Congress that we can, we must, and we will pass the Employee Free Choice Act this year.”

Over the past month, new developments have continued to build on the momentum for the Employee Free Choice Act: the bill was introduced in both the House and the Senate; independent polling confirmed a majority of the public supports its passage; over 40 leading economists — including Nobel laureates — released a joint statement endorsing the legislation as a critical part of our economic recovery; and just this week the “Faces of the Employee Free Choice Act” campaign was unveiled by award-winning cast members of The West Wing standing alongside workers to promote the freedom to form unions on Capitol Hill.

Roberta Ayala, a teacher’s aide from Denver, CO, and Joe Bordelon, a security technician from Denham Springs, LA, were part of the delegation of workers who came to Congress this week, and are traveling throughout their states during the recess to share their firsthand accounts of why workers need the Employee Free Choice Act. 

Roberta conveyed that she wanted a union for her coworkers “to be treated fairly,” and to be “better advocates for our students.”

Joe pressed his case for the bill to lawmakers, explaining “It’s not fair that we ask the middle class to suffer and not get raises equal to the cost of living, while companies lay people off and continue to pay millions of dollars to CEOs.”

You can watch the “Fabric of America” ad by clicking on this link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXvGYr8a5o8

 

IBT News Release:
TEAMSTERS SUPPORT SHIPA

IBT THROWS WEIGHT BEHIND SAFE HIGHWAYS AND INFRASTRUCTURE PRESERVATION ACT; LARGER TRUCKS CAUSE SAFETY ISSUES, ACCELERATE DAMAGE TO HIGHWAYS & BRIDGES

(April 1, 2009) Representatives from the Teamsters Union joined Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ), Rep. James McGovern (D-MA) and safety advocates at a press conference today to voice their support for the Safe Highways and Infrastructure Preservation Act (SHIPA), legislation that would extend the current restrictions on the size and weight of trucks that travel the U.S. highways.

Teamsters Safety and Health Department Director LaMont Byrd Lamont Byrd
The Safety and Health Department coordinates the Teamsters’ safety and health programs. The Department serves as a source for technical advice and training for members, Local officers, and Joint Councils dealing with occupational safety and health and transportation safety problems.
      In addition the Department helps represent members’ interests during collective bargaining and on regulatory matters in all aspects of the safety and health field.
      Specifically, Department staff can provide assistance on issues such as: workers’ rights under OSHA and DOT, truck safety, chemical hazards and "right to know," medical qualifications for drivers, drug testing, exposure monitoring and ventilation, and work-related injuries.
      The Department also administers a hazardous waste and hazardous materials handling training program (EPA Superfund, Department of Energy, and Department of Transportation) conducted throughout the United States, and can assist Locals in setting up safety and health committees and training programs.

Currently, limitations on size and weight are enforced on interstate highways while states are allowed to set the limits on all other roads. SHIPA would extend the restrictions to cover the entire National Highway System.

“The Teamsters strongly support the bill sponsored by Sen. Lautenberg and Rep. McGovern,” said LaMont Byrd, Teamsters Safety and Health Department Director. “Large trucks are more dangerous to drive and damage highways and bridges, the safety, highway design and operating issues involved in allowing bigger trucks are not worth the negligible gains in productivity they might realize.”

States and federal government agencies don’t have enough funds to properly repair, maintain and expand our infrastructure to meet growing transportation needs, let alone build out the reinforced infrastructure necessary to operate longer and heavier vehicles on the current system.


BOEING NEGOTIATIONS CONTINUE

LONG, HARD HOURS PUT IN BY BOTH SIDES

Boeing Negotiations Update(April 3, 2009) Boeing negotiations continue. Both sides continued to be represented by the same teams. (Representing the Union are Secretary-Treasurer Rick Hicks, Senior Business Agents Erv Lemon and Patty Warren, and bargaining committee members Donny Jones, Ric Monroe, Dana Moore, Dan Poole and Darcy Sansaver.  Representing management are Yvette Morgan, Employee Relations; Clay Langhurst, Employee Relations, West Region; Mike Turek, Director, Licensed Transportation and Fleet Services; Ken Schoolcraft, Contract Administration; Ken Tutino, Operations Manager; and Scott McKay, Human Resources.)

Both sides worked hard, long hours throughout the last several days.  Each day starts with the parties caucusing (meeting with their respective committee) and preparing counterproposals. We then get back together for face-to-face meetings and exchange our revised proposals. As bargaining progresses, less time is spent in face-to-face meetings and more time spent in caucus brainstorming our response. Unlike past negotiations, the parties have spent full days in negotiations, either in caucus or across the table. We have had complete, productive (and at times testy) discussions on all issues and have made forward progress each day.

At this time (6:30 p.m. Friday night) we are waiting for management’s latest counterproposal. We still hope to meet our goal to conclude negotiations over language this week — so we can move into economics next week. We hope to reach agreement by next Thursday, April 9. We will be conducting a vote on Saturday, April 11. It will either be a contract ratification vote or a strike authorization vote.

Eligibility to Vote. You must be a member in good standing (paid through March, 2009) in order to vote. If you have any doubt about your eligibility, you should call the dues office to check, even if you are on checkoff. No proxy votes are permitted. You must be present to vote.

KEEP THE DATE!

DATE:  April 11, 2009
TIME:  10 a.m.
PLACE:  Teamsters Hall – Main Auditorium
14675 Interurban Ave S., Tukwila, WA

 

BOEING NEGOTIATIONS HAVE BEGUN
TWO WEEKS OF BARGAINING SCHEDULED

airplane(March 31, 2009) Boeing negotiations have begun. The Union and the Employer have scheduled two weeks of negotiations. Representing the Union are Secretary-Treasurer Rick Hicks, Senior Business Agents Erv Lemon and Patty Warren, and bargaining committee members Donny Jones, Ric Monroe, Dana Moore, Dan Poole and Darcy Sansaver. Representing management are Yvette Morgan, Employee Relations; Clay Langhurst, Employee Relations, West Region; Mike Turek, Director, Licensed Transportation and Fleet Services; Ken Schoolcraft, Contract Administration; Ken Tutino, Operations Manager; and Scott McKay, Human Resources.

On Monday, March 30, the parties met face-to-face to begin negotiations. The Union committee presented the Company with an offer covering all non-economic issues. We had met last Friday as a committee to put our proposal in writing, taking into consideration the issues raised by the members at the demands meeting, the results of the surveys, and the institutional knowledge of the committee. All of the issues raised were incorporated into the proposal prepared by the committee and presented to management.

The Company did not come in with a complete proposal. They raised some issues, had some proposals, and told us additional proposals would be forthcoming. We requested they put all their proposals on the table, and they agreed to do so by the end of the day on Tuesday.  Both sides began the process of responding to the other sides proposals.

On Tuesday, March 31, 2009, the Company came with the rest of their proposals. Each side has shared with the other either specific language or concepts for all sections. The cards on language are now on the table. We continue to work on counterproposals.

It is our goal to conclude negotiations over language this week so we can move into economics next week. We hope to reach agreement by next Thursday, April 9. We will be conducting a vote on Saturday, April 11. It will either be a contract ratification vote or a strike authorization vote. KEEP THE DATE:

DATE:  April 11, 2009
TIME:  10 a.m.
PLACE:  Teamsters Hall – Main Auditorium, 14675 Interurban Ave S., Tukwila, WA

 

OAK HARBOR FREIGHT LINES ULP STRIKE REPORT
GREED, ARROGANCE AND HYPOCRICY CONTINUE TO BE THE BEHAVIOR PATTERNS SHOWN BY THE OWNERS OF THE SELFISH FREIGHT COMPANY

Carrying picket signs
The Teamsters are not on the picketline any longer. The 157-day Unfair Labor Practice Strike while they were picketing triggered widespread service disruptions and cost Oak Harbor more than half of its business. The workers are back at work now, but the negotiations struggle continues in the background. The Company and the Teamsters are in mediation.

(March 30, 2009) Teamster workers involved in the Unfair Labor Practice Strike against Oak Harbor Freight Lines put down their picket signs and went back to work on an “unconditional return-to-work agreement” in an attempt to resolve outstanding differences. Despite its promises, however, the Company ignored the rules and on February 25, 2009 illegally suspended 13 Oak Harbor Teamsters without pay for standing strong on the picketline. 
 
Then the Company fired 6 of the 13 on trumped up charges,
leaving these fellow Brothers and Sisters in a financial bind.

In a commentary in the current issue of the Joint Council 28 Washington Teamster Newspaper, Teamsters International Vice President Al Hobart addresses these recent developments in the dispute with Oak Harbor Freight Lines. It is reprinted below.

OHFL SAGA NOT OVER YET

By AL HOBART
Joint Council 28 President and International Vice President

The Oak Harbor Freight Lines saga continues. The Union made an Unconditional Offer to Return to Work as a means to restart negotiations and to provide, where positions are available, some financial relief for members who have been on strike for over five months. The Unconditional Offer to Return to Work was to be a return to the status quo under the expired Labor Agreement that was in effect at the time of the Unfair Labor Practice Strike.

The 600-plus members and their families employed at Oak Harbor Freight Lines, covering twelve Locals in Washington, Oregon and Idaho, that were on strike have paid a tremendous cost in their sacrifice to protect the wages, hours of work, working conditions, including healthcare and retirement benefits. These are the areas as well as the seniority provisions which are the core foundation of Teamster Collective Bargaining Agreements in all Sectors.

The fight to negotiate a fair contract with this Employer continues. The Vander Pols are continuing their effort to get rid of the Union and show their true regard for the men and women. 

On a daily basis this Employer violates the National Labor Relations Act. Unfair Labor Practice charges have been filed for these actions and additional charges are pending review. Greed and arrogance in Corporate America have touched every American, but when it comes from those who claim to be of social concern and care for their employees, hypocrisy is in full bloom at the leadership of Oak Harbor.

I continue to be impressed and humbled by the dedication and commitment of the men and women of the twelve Locals — who while struggling to pay their monthly bills and support their families by not giving in to this Employer — have shown a level of unionism reflected throughout Labor History. The fight will continue, with the Union committed to our Members, to achieve a fair Collective Bargaining Agreement.

This while the Vander Pols seem willing to see these families, who in the past believed that they were part of an “Oak Harbor Family,” suffer and struggle to maintain their standard of living while being treated in an unconscionable manner by this new generation of Vander Pols who apparently lost the meaning of working together for the good of the family.

We can only hope that as the process evolves, that sanity and reason will prevail and the parties will reach agreement and begin anew rebuilding of relationships resulting in a strong, viable Company.


UNITED STATES SENATE CONFIRMS GARY LOCKE

FORMER GOVERNOR OF WASHINGTON STATE IS THE NEW SECRETARY OF COMMERCE IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA
Carrying picket signs
New U.S. Secretary of Commerce Gary Locke. Local 174 website readers are familiar with Locke, who is a former popular and successful Governor of Washington State.

(March 24, 2009) From a United States Department of Commerce News Release, Washington, D.C  — The United States Senate this evening confirmed Gary Locke as the nation’s 36th Commerce Secretary by unanimous consent.

Secretary Locke will be a key member of President Barack Obama’s economic team and will work to foster and promote American economic development at home, and will be an influential ambassador for American business and industry abroad. Locke is the first Chinese American to serve as Commerce Secretary.

“I’m honored to take on this challenge and will work every day to make the Commerce Department an engine for improving our competitiveness, encouraging innovation and creating jobs,” Locke said.

Locke will oversee a Department that, under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, is charged with expanding the country’s broadband infrastructure, bringing economic development to communities hardest hit by the recession and putting Americans to work under programs run by the Census, NOAA and the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Former Washington State Gov. Gary Locke is a tireless and successful champion of American products, services and jobs. As the popular two-term Governor of the nation’s most trade-dependent State, Locke broke down trade barriers around the world to advance American products.

Locke has worked closely with Business, Labor and Government at all levels to successfully negotiate complex issues. For the past four years, Locke has been a successful business advocate and adviser, helping U.S. companies break into international markets, particularly in Asia, and expand their international business. A partner in the Seattle office of the international law firm of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Locke co-chairs the firm’s China practice and is active in its governmental relations practice.


PERSONAL FACTS ABOUT GARY LOCKE
Locke was elected Washington’s 21st Governor in 1996, making him the first Chinese American Governor in U.S. history and the first Asian American Governor on the mainland. In 2000, Locke was overwhelmingly re-elected to a second term. He served as chair of the Democratic Governors Association and gave the Democratic response to the State of the Union Address in 2003.

To open doors for Washington State businesses, Locke led 10 productive trade missions to Asia, Mexico and Europe, significantly expanding the sales of Washington products and services. He successfully fostered economic relations between China and Washington State. His visits are credited with introducing Washington companies to China and helping more than double the State’s exports to China to over $5 billion per year. He also opened a Washington State trade office in Germany to advance trade relations with European countries.

Locke is widely praised in Washington State for winning a nationwide competition to win production of Boeing’s newest jetliner, the 787, which created thousands of jobs in the State. Locke successfully aligned leaders from State, County and Local Government, businesses and unions, communities and tribes in this comprehensive, successful effort.

As part of his considerable trade and economic development efforts, Locke launched Washington’s Competitiveness Council with Business and Labor leaders working together to effectively position Washington State for success at home and around the world. During the eight years of the Locke Administration, the state gained 280,000 jobs.

Locke personally negotiated and signed a Washington State-Canada Salmon Treaty after negotiations between the U.S. State Department and Canada reached an impasse on protecting wild salmon runs. He also conceived and launched the West Coast Governors’ Initiative on Climate Change and successfully launched public and private initiatives to reduce dependence on fossil fuels and increase energy conservation.

Locke earned a Bachelor’s Degree in Political Science from Yale University and a Law Degree from Boston University.


PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA ON WHAT’S GOING ON

THE NATION’S ELECTED LEADER TALKS ABOUT THE WORLD OUTLOOK NOW, AND WHAT HE IS TRYING TO DO ABOUT IT, IN AN EDITORIAL
President Barack Obama
President Barack Obama is doing many things quickly in the first few weeks of his Presidency. It is hard to keep up with everything. In a recent editorial in the Los Angeles Times Newspaper, he explained what is going on in the world in his opinion, and how he is attempting to deal with it as our nation’s elected leader.

(March 24, 2009) President Barack Obama is doing a lot, but it is hard to keep up with all the reasons he does what he does. In a March 24, 2009 editorial in the Los Angeles Times Newspaper, he talked about those reasons.

The editorial is part of his “public offensive” to get directly to the U.S. citizenry to describe his actions and his policy proposals out of the circuslike atmosphere of Washington, D.C., and away from the sniping of the bigmouths in the Congress — in both the House and Senate — directed at him and at each other.

His commentary is reprinted below.

MAKING THE WORLD WORK AGAIN
By UNITED STATES PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA
We are living through a time of global economic challenges that cannot be met by half-measures or the isolated efforts of any nation. Now, the leaders of the G-20 have a responsibility to take bold, comprehensive and coordinated action that not only jump-starts recovery but launches a new era of economic engagement to prevent a crisis like this from ever happening again.
No one can deny the urgency of action. A crisis in credit and confidence has swept across borders, with consequences for every corner of the world. For the first time in a generation, the global economy is contracting and trade is shrinking. Trillions of dollars have been lost, banks have stopped lending and tens of millions around the globe will lose their jobs. The prosperity of every nation has been endangered, along with the stability of governments and the survival of people in the most vulnerable parts of the world.
We have learned that the success of the American economy is inextricably linked to the global economy. There is no line between action that restores growth within our borders and action that supports it beyond. If people in other countries cannot spend, markets dry up; already we've seen the biggest drop in American exports in nearly four decades, which has led directly to American job losses. And if we continue to let financial institutions around the world act recklessly and irresponsibly, we will remain trapped in a cycle of bubble and bust. That is why the upcoming London summit of the world's 20 leading economies is directly relevant to our recovery at home.

MY MESSAGE
My message is clear: The United States is ready to lead, and we call on our partners to join us with a sense of urgency and common purpose. Much good work has been done, but much more remains. Our leadership is grounded in a simple premise: We will act boldly to lift the American economy out of crisis and reform our regulatory structure, and these actions will be strengthened by complementary action abroad. Through our example, the United States can promote a global recovery and build confidence around the world; and if the London summit helps galvanize collective action, we can forge a secure recovery, and future crises can be averted.
Our efforts must begin with swift action to stimulate growth. Already, the United States has passed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act -- the most dramatic effort to jump-start job creation and lay a foundation for growth in a generation. Other members of the G-20 have pursued fiscal stimulus as well, and these efforts should be robust and sustained until demand is restored. As we go forward, we should embrace a collective commitment to encourage open trade and investment, while resisting the protectionism that would deepen this crisis.
Second, we must restore the credit that businesses and consumers depend on. At home, we are working aggressively to stabilize our financial system. This includes an honest assessment of the balance sheets of our major banks, and will lead directly to lending that can help Americans purchase goods, stay in their homes and grow their businesses.
This must continue to be amplified by the actions of our G-20 partners. Together, we can embrace a common framework that insists on transparency, accountability and a focus on restoring the flow of credit that is the lifeblood of a growing global economy. And the G-20, together with multilateral institutions, can provide trade finance to help lift up exports and create jobs.
Third, we have an economic, security and moral obligation to extend a hand to countries and people who face the greatest risk. If we turn our backs on them, the suffering caused by this crisis will be enlarged and our own recovery will be delayed because markets for our goods will shrink further and more U.S. jobs will be lost. The G-20 should quickly deploy resources to stabilize emerging markets, substantially boost the emergency capacity of the International Monetary Fund and help regional development banks accelerate lending. Meanwhile, America will support new and meaningful investments in food security that can help the poorest weather the difficult days that will come.

STATUS QUO IS NO ANSWER
While these actions can help get us out of crisis, we cannot settle for a return to the status quo. We must put an end to the reckless speculation and spending beyond our means; to the bad credit, over-leveraged banks and absence of oversight that condemns us to bubbles that inevitably bust. Only coordinated international action can prevent the irresponsible risk-taking that caused this crisis. That is why I am committed to seizing this opportunity to advance comprehensive reforms of our regulatory and supervisory framework.

All of our financial institutions -- on Wall Street and around the globe -- need strong oversight and common- sense rules. All markets should have standards for stability and a mechanism for disclosure. A strong framework of capital requirements should protect against future crises. We must crack down on offshore tax havens and money laundering. Rigorous transparency and accountability must check abuse, and the days of out-of-control compensation must end. Instead of patchwork efforts that enable a race to the bottom, we must provide the clear incentives for good behavior that foster a race to the top.
I know that America bears its share of responsibility for the mess that we all face. But I also know that we need not choose between a chaotic and unforgiving capitalism and an oppressive government-run economy. That is a false choice that will not serve our people or any people.

This G-20 meeting provides a forum for a new kind of global economic cooperation. Now is the time to work together to restore the sustained growth that can only come from open and stable markets that harness innovation, support entrepreneurship and advance opportunity.

The nations of the world have a stake in one another. The United States is ready to join a global effort on behalf of new jobs and sustainable growth. Together, we can learn the lessons of this crisis and forge a prosperity that is enduring and secure for the 21st century.

 

OAK HARBOR UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICE STRIKE UPDATE
TEAMSTERS HAVE RETURNED-TO-WORK, BUT COURTROOM STRUGGLE CONTINUES, AS DOES THE UNION’S BATTLE AGAINST GREEDY KEYBANK

Picketers
The Teamsters are not on the picketline any more, but the outstanding differences between them and Oak Harbor Freight Lines still exist. The 157-day Unfair Labor Practice Strike triggered widespread service disruptions and cost Oak Harbor more than half of its business. The battle is not over yet.
(March 20, 2009) On February 12, 2009, striking workers offered to return-to-work in an attempt to resolve outstanding differences. In response, the company is attempting to fire thirteen workers represented by the Teamsters, and illegally eliminate workers' healthcare and pension plans. The latest unlawful move by Oak Harbor could incite a new strike just as the company is attempting to recover from the 157-day strike that triggered widespread service disruptions and cost Oak Harbor more than half of its business.

“It was our hope that the company would take our offer to return-to-work as a positive step toward resolving our differences,” said Teamsters International Vice President Al Hobart. “But it is now clear that Oak Harbor's owners and their union busting attorney are willing to sacrifice customers, ruin the lives of hard working union families and drive this company into the ground to get rid of the Teamsters.”

While the lawyers and negotiators are talking, the Teamsters Union is still putting heat on the big companies that used the services of Oak Harbor during the Unfair Labor Practice Strike — and the financiers of the Oak Harbor Company during the 157-days it lasted in its “public” form on the picketline.

One of the chief financiers, KeyBank, was singled out twice recently. Following are two IBT press releases describing what has happened in this aspect of the dispute.

 
1. KING COUNTY WASHINGTON PUTS KEYBANK CONTRACT OUT FOR BID

Churches Urge Officials to Consider KeyBank's Support of Workers' Rights Violations

(March 18, 2009 - Washington State) The Metropolitan King County Council decided to bid out the financial services contract for the entire County on Monday, March 16. KeyBank (NYSE: KEY) held the contract for at least the past five years. At Monday's hearing testimony was given by a worker at Oak Harbor Freight who was illegally suspended from her Job and from a representative of Seattle's churches against retaining KeyBank.

KeyBank is the primary lender to Oak Harbor Freight, an Auburn, Washington-based firm that caused its Teamsters Union workers to go on strike for 157 days due to unfair labor practices. The National Labor Relations Board has found merit in the Union's claim that Oak Harbor violated the workers' rights under federal labor law.

“Oak Harbor Freight Lines, which receives its funding from KeyBank, broke American labor law and violated international labor standards over the past two years in an ongoing effort to punish its workers and their families,” said Ann Erikson with the Seattle Council of Churches representing 419 faith communities. “Teamster members are fighting to protect their standard of living and to save Oak Harbor retirees' health care.”

Angel Emerson, an 11-1/2-year Oak Harbor Freight employee, urged the Council to support the workers at Oak Harbor Freight. “Earlier this year the National Labor Relations Board found merit to our allegations that Oak Harbor violated federal labor law and bargained in bad faith with its employees,” Emerson said. “After the strike concluded I resumed to work, but then i was illegally suspended from Oak Harbor Freight for standing strong with my fellow coworkers during the strike.”

“We believe that King County values social responsibility,” said Al Hobart, International Vice President of the Teamsters Union. “The thread of social responsibility weaves through many of their outreach programs so we hope that it also enjoys a central role in their choice for a new financial services contract for the county.”

Account maintenance, deposit services, wire transfer services and warrant services are the main elements of the financial service package being bid.

 

2. OHIO TEAMSTERS PULL $14 MILLION OUT OF KEYBANK

Cite KeyCorp Support of Workers’ Rights Violations

(March 16, 2009 – Washington, D.C.) Ohio Teamsters transferred about $14 million in assets out of KeyCorp (NYSE: KEY) last week after the Cleveland-based bank failed to take action to support workers’ rights. KeyBank and its parent company, KeyCorp, are the primary lender to Oak Harbor Freight Lines, based in Auburn, Washington, where more than 550 workers and their families are fighting to protect their standard of living and to save Oak Harbor retirees' health care.

“We won’t stand by while KeyCorp finances a company that is waging war against our fellow brothers and sisters,” said Gary Tiboni, President of Teamsters Joint Council 41 in Cleveland. “If KeyCorp wants our business, it needs to stop supporting workers’ rights abuses.”

Oak Harbor employees in Oregon, Washington, and Idaho have tried to negotiate a new contract with Oak Harbor since August 2007. Oak Harbor’s most recent proposal would permanently freeze pay for newly hired clerical staff, allow the company to arbitrarily fire clerical staff, permanently deny new warehouse workers access to health and welfare benefits, eliminate paid sick leave, and shift much more of the cost of health care onto employees. Oak Harbor’s latest offer also would freeze workers’ pensions and eliminate health care coverage for retirees who had previously been promised coverage.

On February 24, Oak Harbor workers ended a 157-day unfair labor practice strike aimed at stopping the company from violating federal labor laws and bargaining in bad faith. After returning to work, Oak Harbor’s owners illegally eliminated returning workers' health care and pension plans and switched employees to a substandard health care plan. The company also suspended 13 union supporters.

The latest unlawful move by Oak Harbor could incite a new strike just as the company is attempting to recover from widespread service disruptions created by the most recent strike.

“We truly appreciate the support of our brothers and sisters in Ohio,” said Teamsters International Vice President Al Hobart. “I expect more unions to begin withdrawing funds from KeyCorp in the coming weeks and months as they learn more about the workers’ rights violations KeyCorp is supporting.”

 

STRENGTHEN UNIONS TO REBUILD ECONOMY
OPPONENTS OF THE EMPLOYEE FREE CHOICE ACT HAVE LAUNCHED
A FIERCE ATTACK ON THE LEGISLATION, FULL OF LIES AND DECEPTION

Senator Tom Harkin
U.S. Democratic Senator Tom Harkin of Iowa explains at a meeting why the Employee Free Choice Act would help all Americans, not just union members.
(March 16, 2009) Multinational corporations and their front groups are launching a furious attack on the Employee Free Choice Act, which was introduced [last] week in Congress.

Hundreds of corporate lobbyists flew into Washington to make their case. Tens of millions of dollars have been spent on anti-union advertising, with much more to come.

Several hundred workers also came to Washington to support Employee Free Choice. At least one worker who was fired because he wanted to join the Teamsters had never flown on an airplane before.

We have a number of allies who support Employee Free Choice, including religious groups, Nobel Prize-winning economists and leading U.S. corporations such as Levi Strauss and American Electric Power. They believe, as we do, that strengthening unions is the way to rebuild America.

MOST SIGNIFICANT CHANGE SINCE 1935 WAGNER ACT
There's no doubt in my mind that passing the Employee Free Choice Act would bring about the most significant change for unions in the workplace since the Wagner Act took effect in 1935.

Under the status quo, the corporations get to decide whether there will be a government-supervised election for a union. Under Employee Free Choice, the workers would choose how their votes are counted. The workers could either have a secret-ballot election or majority sign-up, which is also known as card check.

That's important to us. These elections have devolved into union-busting campaigns during which workers are harassed and intimidated. A recent study shows that a pro-union worker is illegally fired in 25 percent of all organizing campaigns for an election supervised by the National Labor Relations Board. We much prefer majority sign-up.

It's important to the multinationals and their front groups that are spending tens -- if not hundreds -- of millions of their shareholders' dollars to oppose Employee Free Choice. They don't want to give up their ability to bully their workers.

ANTI-LABOR FORCES LIE ABOUT THE SECRET BALLOT
They say Employee Free Choice would take away workers' rights to the secret ballot. They argue that the secret ballot is the linchpin of democracy, that it would be somehow un-American to take it away. They claim to care about workers who might be intimidated by a union if their secret ballot is taken away. Of course, the secret ballot doesn't protect workers from management intimidation. How can it, when union organizers routinely get fired? It is also untrue that Employee Free Choice takes away the secret ballot. Let me repeat: If the Employee Free Choice Act becomes law, workers could choose to cast their votes in a secret ballot.

ANALYSIS OF THE WAGNER ACT
Sen. Robert Wagner of New York sponsored the law in 1935 that bears his name. The Wagner Act recognized the right of workers to form unions. Wagner understood that the difference between despotism and democracy is not the secret ballot, but whether workers have the right to bargain collectively.

The corporate-funded front groups opposing Employee Free Choice can't pretend they support collective bargaining. So they claim that expanding unions would be bad for the economy. Just recently a spokesman for one of the front groups called Employee Free Choice "a poison pill for our ailing economy."

Those are the same arguments used by opponents of the Wagner Act. In 1935, Guy Harrington of the National Publisher's Association said supporting the bill "would permanently close the door to recovery."

STRONG UNIONS WOULD MEAN A HEALTHY ECONOMY
The U.S. economy recovered after the Wagner Act became law in 1935. If the Employee Free Choice Act becomes law, I am quite confident the U.S. economy will return to health.

History shows that the economy does well when unions are strong. In these dire economic times, I can't think of a better way to restore stability to middle-class families than to strengthen unions.

HOFFA COMMENDS SPONSORS OF EMPLOYEE FREE CHOICE

Last week, Teamster General President Hoffa commended the EFCA’s sponsors and blasted the lies about secret ballots being spread by opponents of the Act. Here is the IBT News Release that reported on what he said:

(March 10, 2009) Teamsters General President Jim Hoffa today praised House and Senate sponsors of the Employee Free Choice Act.

Senator Patty Murray Senator Maria Cantewell
Left-to-right, two of the U.S. Senate co-sponsors of the Employee Free Choice Act, Washington State’s U.S. Senators Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell.

The bill would give workers the choice of forming a union through majority sign-up or a National Labor Relations Board election.  It would make it easier for workers to form a union.

“In these dire economic times, I can’t think of a better way to restore stability to middle-class families than to strengthen unions,” Hoffa said. “History shows that the economy does well when unions are strong.”
Hoffa blasted the hostile, multimillion-dollar campaign to defeat the Employee Free Choice Act.

“This business about the Employee Free Choice Act taking away the secret ballot is nonsense spread by front groups for corporate fat cats who don’t want to give up their $16,000 wastebaskets,” Hoffa said.  

“Since when is the secret ballot a basic tenet of democracy?” Hoffa said. “Town meetings in New England are as democratic as they come, and they don’t use the secret ballot. Elections in the Soviet Union were by secret ballot, but those weren’t democratic.”

The bill would also strengthen penalties for violations against workers who are trying to organize or negotiate a first contract, and ensure all parties negotiate a first contract in good faith.

For 74 years, workers have formed unions either through majority sign-up or a NLRB election. However, employers can veto workers' decision to organize through majority signup and force them into a divisive NLRB election process. A recent study shows that a pro-union worker is illegally fired in a quarter of all organizing campaigns for NLRB election.

(The above editorial first appeared in the March 13, 2009 issue of the Detroit News.)

 

APPLICATION DEADLINE MARCH 31
JAMES R. HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND

(March 10, 2009 — IBT News Release) James R. Hoffa became a Teamster member in 1934 and served as the IBT’s General President for 14 years. In recognition of his tireless service to the Union and its members, he was honored as General President Emeritus for life. James R. Hoffa Scholarship

At the November 1999 General Executive Board Meeting, General Secretary-Treasurer C. Thomas Keegel presented a resolution to establish the James R. Hoffa Memorial Scholarship Fund. This article describes the James R. Hoffa Memorial Scholarship Fund and outlines eligibility requirements and application procedures for this year’s competition.

The deadline for applying to the Scholarship Fund is March 31, 2009.

One hundred scholarships will be awarded this program year. Applicants compete in one of the five geographic regions where the Teamster parent’s Local Union is located.

Thirty-one of the awards total $10,000 each. These four-year scholarships are disbursed at the rate of $2,500 per year and are renewable annually. Sixty-nine of the awards are one-time $1,000 grants. These scholarships are disbursed to the college or university at the beginning of the recipient’s freshman year.

Eligibility requirements and application procedures are the same for all awards. Recipients are selected by an impartial committee of university admissions and financial aid directors based on academic achievement, SAT/ACT scores, character, potential and financial need. We consider all applicants without regard to race, religion, gender, disability, or any other legally protected status.

GUIDELINES
The Scholarship Fund has established some guidelines to be used by students when deciding whether or not to apply to this program.

Applicants should: Rank in the top 15 percent of their high school class; have, or expect to have, excellent SAT or ACT scores; and
demonstrate financial need.

Due to the highly competitive nature of the program and the large number of applicants, students should carefully consider these criteria before submitting an application.

The James R Hoffa Memorial Scholarship Fund is an independent organization established and registered as a tax exempt entity under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Fund is established solely to provide scholarships to the children and dependents of members of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, and contributions to the Fund are deductible as charitable contributions to the extent permitted by law. The International Union provides certain in kind services to the Fund, such as this portion of the Union website, in order to benefit members and their children and dependents.

For more information on the James R. Hoffa Memorial Scholarship, click here.

 

OAK HARBOR ULP STRIKE: WHAT HAPPENS NOW?

What happens next?(March 6, 2009) Following are instructions from the IBT and JC-28 Oak Harbor Freight Lines Unfair Labor Practice Strike Negotiating Committee regarding what returning OHFL employees should do now.

OAK HARBOR FREIGHT LINES STRIKE
Instructions to Returning Oak Harbor Freight Lines Employees

If a customer asks you about the status of the ongoing labor dispute with Oak Harbor, please inform the customer that you are still working without a contract and that there are several unresolved issues from the strike. Refrain from criticizing Oak Harbor to customers.

The unresolved issues include:

  1. Healthcare:  Oak Harbor has decided to unlawfully eliminate returning workers' healthcare plan and switch returning workers to a substandard plan administered by the company.
     
  2. Pension:  Oak Harbor is illegally holding pension contributions in an escrow account, tying up Oak Harbor employees' retirement funds.
     
  3. Retirees:  Oak Harbor is illegally holding contributions to their retirees' healthcare fund in an escrow account, effectively reneging on the company's obligation to contribute to their retirees' healthcare costs.
     
  4. Suspensions:  Oak Harbor has placed thirteen union supporters on suspension without pay for alleged picketline misconduct.

The Union and our attorneys are currently reviewing possible responses. Local 174 promptly filed an unfair labor practice charge against Oak Harbor for its actions, and will vigorously represent the members accused of misconduct.

PRESS COVERAGE OF THE ULP STRIKE
The Auburn Reporter recently printed a good summary of the Oak Harbor Freight Lines Unfair Labor Practice Strike. That article is available here for your information.
footer